BREAKING: Chief Justice John Roberts Issues Rare Statement Rebuking Donald Trump

This type of statement is extremely rare for a Justice of the Supreme Court to issue, especially against a sitting President.

BREAKING: In a striking and unusual move, Chief Justice John Roberts issued a public statement pushing back against Donald Trump’s calls to impeach U.S. District Judge James Boasberg.

If you appreciate independent, no-nonsense reporting that cuts through the spin, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support helps me continue holding this Administration accountable in pursuit of the truth.

Though Roberts did not mention Trump by name, his statement was a clear rebuke of the president’s latest attack on the judiciary, highlighting the constitutional principle that judicial rulings should not be subject to political retaliation.

“For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision,” Roberts stated. “The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”

The remarks come in response to Trump’s demand that Judge Boasberg, who serves as the chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, be impeached. Boasberg recently ruled against Trump in a case involving Trump’s ability to deport Venezuelan migrants under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798.

Roberts’ statement is remarkable not only for its content but for its rarity. The Chief Justice of the United States typically avoids public commentary on political disputes, particularly when they involve a former or sitting president. The judiciary, by design, seeks to maintain an air of impartiality and independence, and Roberts has long been an advocate for keeping the courts separate from partisan battles.

That Roberts felt compelled to issue such a statement underscores the gravity of Trump’s rhetoric and its potential threat to the judiciary’s independence. Calls for judicial impeachment over substantive rulings, rather than for misconduct, strike at the heart of the separation of powers—a cornerstone of American democracy.

This is not the first time Roberts has pushed back against Trump’s attempts to undermine the judiciary. In 2018, after Trump dismissed a ruling by an “Obama judge,” Roberts issued a rare public statement defending the integrity of the federal bench, declaring, “We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges. What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them.”

At its core, Roberts’ statement is a defense of the constitutional framework that ensures the judiciary remains insulated from political pressure. The impeachment process is designed to remove judges for serious ethical violations or misconduct—not as a tool for punishing decisions that displease political figures.

By issuing this statement, Roberts is reaffirming a fundamental principle: judicial independence is essential to the rule of law. While Trump’s attacks on judges are nothing new, the fact that they have now elicited such a direct response from the Chief Justice is a stark reminder of the potential damage they can inflict.