In a politically charged maneuver that could reshape the 2026 election landscape, President Donald Trump is set to sign a presidential memorandum today aimed at curbing foreign interference in U.S. elections. But critics argue the real target isn’t foreign actors — it’s ActBlue, the lifeblood of Democratic fundraising.
My work would not be possible without the backing of readers like you, so please consider subscribing today:
The directive, first reported by Politico, claims to crack down on foreign contributions — a move the administration is calling essential for safeguarding democracy. However, insiders warn that the memorandum disproportionately singles out ActBlue, the platform that has powered grassroots donations for Democratic candidates and causes across the country.
For nearly two decades, ActBlue has served as the digital backbone of small-dollar Democratic fundraising. The platform has helped level the playing field, enabling everyday Americans to support candidates with as little as $1 — a dynamic that has fueled historic victories and competitive races even in traditionally red districts.
Now, the Trump administration’s memo alleges that ActBlue has become “notorious for its lax standards,” citing a House investigation that found at least 22 significant fraud campaigns — nearly half with foreign ties. Among the alleged findings: 237 donations originating from foreign IP addresses using prepaid cards during a 30-day window in the 2024 cycle.
The timing of the crackdown — just as the 2026 election cycle gains momentum — has sparked alarm among Democrats.
“This is the next version of ‘the big lie,’” said ActBlue CEO Regina Wallace-Jones, referencing Trump’s ongoing false claims about widespread election fraud. “Nothing will deter or interrupt ActBlue’s mission and work to enable millions of Americans to participate in our democracy.”
ActBlue responded further in a statement to Politico: “ActBlue plays a vital role in enabling all Americans to participate in our democracy and the organization strictly abides by all federal and state laws. These attacks are not based in fact — they are politically motivated.”
While the memo puts ActBlue on notice, it notably omits any reference to WinRed — the Republican Party’s equivalent platform — despite public reports that it, too, has faced allegations of fraudulent activity and questionable donations. This discrepancy is fueling accusations that the Trump administration is wielding executive power to kneecap a political adversary under the guise of electoral security.
Attorney General Pam Bondi’s office is reportedly preparing to oversee the enforcement, but details remain murky. What’s clear, critics say, is the political calculus behind the move.
The implications of this move could be seismic. In an era where small-dollar donations are more important than ever, disrupting ActBlue could deal a devastating blow to Democratic candidates nationwide — especially in down-ballot races that rely on digital fundraising to stay competitive.
For now, ActBlue is standing firm. But the specter of executive intervention in the fundraising arena raises chilling questions about the future of American elections — and whether political power is being used not to protect democracy, but to manipulate it.
Share this post